New Case Study: How NVIDIA Parabricks Accelerates Alzheimer's Research with STAR RNA-seq Analysis
More

Why is alert investigation for pipelines still so difficult in the age of AI?

Despite advances in AI and machine learning, investigating pipeline alerts remains a frustrating, manual process. Here's why the problem persists and what it would take to fix it.

const metadata = ; When a data pipeline breaks, we have all the tools we could ask for - monitoring dashboards, logging systems, tracing platforms - but we still spend hours piecing together what went wrong. The problem isn't a lack of data or tooling, it’s that the context required to investigate pipeline incidents has exceeded the cognitive capacity of any individual engineer, or even a well-coordinated team. Correlating pipeline steps to infrastructure alerts When an alert fires in one system, the root cause often lives somewhere else. On one hand you have a pipeline view showing workflow stages, DAG dependencies, data transformations, and business logic steps. On the other hand is the infrastructure view showing CPU utilization, memory pressure, network throughput, and container health. Observability tools like Grafana organize around infrastructure because that's what they can measure. But when issues arise, it’s not easy to map infrastructure alerts to pipelines. This gap creates a translation problem that must be solved manually. Why this correlation is so hard The relationship between pipelines and infrastructure is many-to-many and constantly shifting. - One pipeline step might run across multiple servers - One server might handle multiple pipeline steps (or switch between them dynamically) - Containers and pods are ephemeral, moving around the cluster as orchestrators optimize resource usage - Different pipeline runs might use entirely different infrastructure depending on load, time of day, or configuration changes So when that infrastructure alert fires, someone has to do detective work: 1. Get paged about high CPU on a server 2. Log into that server or check its labels and tags 3. Figure out which service or container is running there 4. Trace back to which pipeline step(s) that service handles 5. Then finally understand the business impact This is exhausting and slow at the best of times. If you’re on call and this alert fires at 3am, well, good luck to you! What's worse, in many instances the alert proves to be a false positive and no action is actually required. When failures cross organizational boundaries The correlation problem gets worse when the people who could help are scattered across different teams. A DAG might break because the platform team tweaked a config. Data engineering colleagues see bad metrics. Product teams get alerts about failing applications. Infra knows the real culprit is a resource bottleneck. Each team holds one piece of the answer, but now you need to coordinate a war room just to figure out what's actually broken. Tribal knowledge compounds the problem. The engineer who understands why a particular workaround was implemented three quarters ago may have moved to a different team, or left the company entirely. What remains are scattered comments in pull requests, outdated runbooks, and institutional memory that exists only in the minds of increasingly scarce domain experts. How AI is changing pipeline alert investigation Over the last few years, generative coding has become the norm, but where has AI been when it comes to the most frustrating and time consuming part of our jobs: investigating pipeline incidents? In the age of AI, investigation should be simple. AI should be able to test multiple hypotheses in parallel. It should be able to fix problems faster. It should be able to learn from past investigations so senior engineers don’t become the bottleneck for every single issue. That’s where Tracer comes in. Tracer investigates every alert before it escalates, testing multiple root-cause hypotheses in parallel. It then attaches an automated investigation report directly to the alert in your existing workflow (e.g. Slack/Teams, PagerDuty, Linear/Jira). Each report lets you know if you need to take action, and gives recommended next steps and a full breakdown of tested hypotheses if you want to dive deeper. Want your alerts investigated before you get pinged? [Try Tracer for free today](https://app.tracer.cloud/sign-up).
Background

Get Started Now

Ready to See
Tracer In Action?

Start for free or
Tracer Logo

Tracer is the first pipeline monitoring system purpose-built for high-compute workloads that lives in the OS.

2025 The Forge Software Inc. | A US Delaware Corporation, registered at 99 Wall Street, Suite 168 New York, NY 10005 | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy